查看: 634|回复: 4

目前还没有证据表明气管早期切开能改善患者预后

[复制链接]

1

主题

1

帖子

187

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
187
发表于 2014-4-7 11:06:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

Timing of tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis.
AbstractOBJECTIVE:To compare important outcomes between early tracheostomy (ET) and late tracheostomy (LT) or prolonged intubation (PI) for critically ill patients receiving long-term ventilation during their treatment.METHOD:We performed computerized searches for relevant articles on PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane register of controlled trials (up to July 2013). We contacted international experts and manufacturers. We included in the study randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ET (performed within 10 days after initiation of laryngeal intubation) and LT (after 10 days of laryngeal intubation) or PI in critically ill adult patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Two investigators evaluated the articles; divergent opinions were resolved by consensus.RESULTS:A meta-analysis was evaluated from nine randomized clinical trials with 2,072 participants. Compared to LT/PI, ET did not significantly reduce short-term mortality [relative risks (RR) = 0.91; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.81-1.03; p = 0.14] or long-term mortality (RR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.76-1.08; p = 0.27). Additionally, ET was not associated with a markedly reduced length of ICU stay [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -4.41 days; 95% CI = -13.44-4.63 days; p = 0.34], ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.71-1.10; p = 0.27) or duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) (WMD = - 2.91 days; 95% CI = -7.21-1.40 days; p = 0.19).CONCLUSION:Among the patients requiring prolonged MV, ET showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes compared to that of the LT/PI group. But more rigorously designed and adequately powered RCTs are required to confirm it in future.









pone.0092981.pdf



2014-4-7 11:06 上传
点击文件名下载附件
下载积分: 金币 -2 金



818.67 KB, 下载次数: 0, 下载积分: 金币 -2 金












上一篇:机械通气1一2小时的也纳入呼吸机相关性肺炎监测吗?下一篇:中心吸引装置更换时间





回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

1031

帖子

639

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
639
发表于 2014-4-7 11:06:01 | 显示全部楼层


重症医学主委,邱海波的书《ICU主治医生手册》,里面就提到到。目前推荐的是当气管插管在7~10天时候,推荐气切。







[h2]评分[/h2]





参与人数 1威望 +2

收起
理由





星火
+ 2
很给力!




查看全部评分


回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

5922

帖子

187

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
187
发表于 2014-4-7 11:06:02 | 显示全部楼层


症医学主委,邱海波的书《ICU主治医生手册》,里面就提到到。目前推荐的是当气管插管在7~10天时候,推荐 ...[/quote]
是呀,气管插管时间过长,VAP的发生率增加的风险会大大提高,而且患者的不适感使得尽早拔出插管成为必要。








回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

2254

帖子

861

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
861
发表于 2014-4-7 11:06:03 | 显示全部楼层


管时间长改为气管切开通气,是综合的原因,与VAP的发生率增加的风险会大大提高无关(气切的风险同样大)








回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

156

帖子

109

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
109
发表于 2014-4-7 11:06:04 | 显示全部楼层


管时间长改为气管切开通气,是综合的原因,与VAP的发生率增加的风险会大大提高无关(气切的风险同样大)同意老师的意见。主要是压迫,患者不适。








回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|(浙ICP备16040142号-3)|山东省消毒供应质量控制中心

Powered by Discuz! X3.4© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表